Input keywords, title, abstract, author, affiliation etc..
Journal Article An open access journal
Journal Article

Conversation Analysis: ESC Method of Chinese and Foreign English Teachers in SEL Class

by Rujing Zhang 1,*  and  Weidong Li 1,*
1
Northeastern University at Qinhuangdao
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 July 2024 / Accepted: 25 July 2024 / Published Online: 30 July 2024

Abstract

This study aims to compare the differences in classroom conversation patterns between Chinese and foreign English teachers and analyze their ways of checking students’ epistemic status in the classroom, the different performances of students with different epistemic status levels, and the measures teachers take when students are at a lower epistemic status level, to provide new perspectives for the study of conversation analysis in the classroom. In the study, two English classroom video samples with great similarities are selected. This study draws the following conclusions through the analysis of data tables and specific conversation examples: 1. There are big differences between Chinese and foreign English teachers in the method of ESC (epistemic status check) to students, Chinese teachers prefer to use interrogative questions (IQ), while the foreign teachers mainly use declarative questions (DQ); 2. When the students are in a high epistemic status level, both Chinese and foreign teachers preferred the form of “students answer questions directly and initiatively”; 3. When the students are in a low epistemic status level, the students tend to be silent (the reason for the appearance of students’ questioning in the foreign teacher’s classrooms may be that the atmosphere of the foreign teacher’s class is more active and the teacher-student relationship is more equal than that of the Chinese teacher’s class); 4. The Chinese teacher’s strategy in the face of students’ low level of epistemic status is mostly Rule 3 of the turn-taking rules; whereas foreign teachers mostly adopt Rule 2 accompanied by encouragement words. Based on the above conclusions, this study suggests that Chinese and foreign English teachers can learn from each other. Chinese teachers can learn from foreign teachers who emphasize students’ participation and interaction, and increase students’ opportunities for expression and thinking. Western teachers can learn from Chinese teachers’ students-group learning methods and skills of maintaining classroom discipline to ensure teaching efficiency.


Copyright: © 2024 by Zhang and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Zhang, R.; Li, W. Conversation Analysis: ESC Method of Chinese and Foreign English Teachers in SEL Class. Journal of Arts, Society, and Education Studies, 2024, 6, 185. doi:10.69610/j.ases.20240730
AMA Style
Zhang R, Li W. Conversation Analysis: ESC Method of Chinese and Foreign English Teachers in SEL Class. Journal of Arts, Society, and Education Studies; 2024, 6(2):185. doi:10.69610/j.ases.20240730
Chicago/Turabian Style
Zhang, Rujing; Li, Weidong 2024. "Conversation Analysis: ESC Method of Chinese and Foreign English Teachers in SEL Class" Journal of Arts, Society, and Education Studies 6, no.2:185. doi:10.69610/j.ases.20240730

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Haziza E. Questioning and addressee knowledge[J]. Synthese, 2023, 201(4): 114.
  2. Lindwall O, Lymer G, Ivarsson J. Epistemic status and the recognizability of social actions[J]. Discourse Studies, 2016, 18(5): 500-525.
  3. Morales M. Epistemic status as an analytic tool: Mapping classroom talk and participation in a middle grades prototyping testing activity[J]. Linguistics and Education, 2021, 64:100939:1-12.
  4. Sacks H, Schegloff E A, Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation[M]//Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. Academic Press, 1978: 7-55.
  5. Sert O. ‘Epistemic status checks an interactional phenomenon in instructed learning settings[J]. Journal of pragmatics, 2013, 45(1): 13-28.
  6. Aibo's SASA. Tubing handling. Reading course for foreign teachers in primary school (full version). [EB/OL]. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1id4y187tq/?spm_id_from=333.880.my_history.page.click&vd_source=20019a563461854d6a22950 3b49100ed. 2023.12.26.
  7. Cui Da Song. On the types and functions of question language in teaching [J]. Journal of Language Applications, 2000, (04): 28-33. DOI:10.16499/j.cnki.1003-5397.2000.04.007.
  8. Jiang Hui. TED speech, the audience the discourse of yuan yuan pragmatic analysis [J]. Foreign language and foreign language teaching, 2020, (4) : 25-35 + 147. DOI: 10.13458 / j.carol carroll nki flatt. 004694
  9. LAN Liangping. Han Gang. Construction of Teacher Identity: An Analysis of Conversational Silence in Classroom questioning [J]. Foreign Language Circle, 2013, (02): 59-68.
  10. Liu Shu. The phenomenon of correction in classroom communication from the perspective of conversation analysis [D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University 2005.
  11. Peng Zhuo. An analysis of the knowledge relationship of the sequence of specific questions in College English classroom under the perspective of epistemology [J]. Journal of the PLA Institute of Foreign Languages, 2021, 44 (06): 99-107.
  12. Qu Jing. Cognitive turn diagnosis under the support of the classroom teaching design [D]. Henan normal university, 2019. The DOI: 10.27118 /, dc nki. Ghesu. 2019.000846
  13. Sun Caixia. Research on Conversational Structure of teacher-student Information Interaction in classroom [D]. Zhejiang Normal University,2012.
  14. Wang Fang. Cho hung. English classroom session words wheel conversion technique contrast research [J]. Journal of xi 'an foreign languages institute, 2004, (4) : 43-45, DOI: 10.16362 / j.carol carroll nki cn61-1457 / h. 2004.04.013
  15. Xiao Feng. Interactive analysis of Classroom Language Behavior: A new research tool for classroom teaching [J]. Journal of Liaoning Normal University,2000,(06):40-44.
  16. Primary school English course assistant. Four up: "U6 Talk&learn" famous teacher quality course teaching record. [EB/OL]. https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1F34y1g7s4/?spm_id_from=333.880.my_history.page.click&vd_source=20019a563461854d6a22950 3b49100ed. 2023.12.26